Journal / Positioning
Essay · Positioning

The guard was asleep. The spec sheet said present.

A security firm I work with keeps losing tenders to a cheaper rival whose guards fall asleep on shift. The price isn't the problem. The problem is that the tender can only measure the things the cheap option has too.

A security firm I work with lost another tender last month to a competitor that costs less and does the job worse. Not slightly worse. One of that competitor's guards was recently found asleep on a night shift, which in that trade is more or less the entire job undone in a single moment. The client who caught them sleeping went looking for someone better, found my client, and was glad they did. Then here is the part that should stop you. When the next contract went out to tender, the firm with the sleeping guard was invited to bid again, on level terms, and had a fair chance of winning it back. Because on the document that decides these things, a guard who sleeps and a guard who doesn't look exactly the same.

How you end up on the spec sheet

A tender is a machine for making everyone comparable. It has to be. The buyer cannot sit with twelve firms over coffee, so instead they build a form, and the form asks the same questions of everyone. Headcount. Hours covered. Certifications held. Response time, on paper. Price. Fill it in, line by line, and you are handed back to the buyer as a column of numbers sitting next to eleven other columns of numbers. That is not a description of your business. It is your business flattened until it fits in a cell.

Comparable feels fair. It is not. The moment a buyer can lay you side by side with a cheaper option and read across the rows, the exercise is already tilted, because almost everything on that form is something the cheap option also has. Guards, they have. Hours, they cover. The certificate, they hold. You have quietly agreed to be judged on the ground you share with the worst firm in the room, and then you are surprised when the worst firm in the room competes with you.

It only prices what it can count

A form can only weigh what a form can count. It counts that a guard was on site. It cannot count whether he was awake. It counts that a patrol was scheduled every hour. It cannot count whether anyone actually walked the far corner of the car park at three in the morning, in the rain, when no one was watching and nothing on the checklist made them. It counts the certificate on the wall. It cannot count the judgement of the person who notices the one thing that was never on any checklist and does something about it before it becomes a break-in.

All of that, the awake, the walked corner, the judgement, is the actual product. It is the whole reason my client is better and the cheap firm is worse. And it is precisely the part the tender is blind to. So you have the best of the thing that matters, competing inside a process built to ignore the thing that matters.

A spec sheet can tell you a guard was on the site. It cannot tell you he was awake. — what the form can't see

This is not a security problem. It is the shape of every business that is genuinely good at something a buyer struggles to see in advance. The accountant who catches the thing your last one missed. The builder whose sites do not leak in year three. The agency whose work actually moves something. On the form, they read the same as the outfit that will let you down. The quality lives in the gap the form throws away.

You agreed to the comparison that beats you

Here is the trap closing. Once two firms match on every row a form can measure, there is only one row left to decide it on. The number at the bottom. You did not lose on quality. You lost because you let the buyer measure you with an instrument that cannot detect quality, and an instrument that cannot detect quality will always, every time, hand the decision to price.

And the better you are, the more this costs you. The distance between you and the cheap firm is the most valuable thing you own, and it is exactly the distance the form deletes. You show up to the fight carrying your one real advantage, and the rules of the fight say you have to leave it at the door. Most good businesses lose this way without ever naming it. They think they lost a deal. They actually lost a definition. Somebody else got to decide what was being bought, and they decided it was hours and pounds, because that is the ground where the cheap firm wins.

Change what's being measured

The way out is not a longer feature list. It is not matching the low price, which just tells the buyer you were overcharging before. The way out is to refuse the unit of comparison and put a better one in its place. Stop selling guards by the hour. Start selling the answer to one question. When it goes wrong at three in the morning, who is actually accountable, and what happens next. Make the buyer picture the sleeping guard, the door that was left open, the morning after, the call they had to make to explain it. Move the decision from "who is cheapest per hour" to "who do I trust with the thing I cannot afford to lose." That second question is one the cheap firm cannot answer well. It is also the only question where being good is worth anything.

That is all positioning really is. Not a slogan. A choice about which axis you are measured on. Your competitors picked price because price is the axis where they win. Your job is to pick the axis where you win, and get the buyer to agree it is the one that matters, before anyone opens a spreadsheet. Sometimes you cannot rewrite the tender itself. You can almost always change the conversation that happens before the tender, with the person who writes it. The firms that win the work they deserve tend to win it early, in that conversation, by changing what the buyer thinks they are buying. By the time the form goes out, it is too late. The form was written by someone who had already decided what counted.

One thing to do this week

Take your last three lost deals. For each one, ask a single question. Was I being compared on an axis where the cheapest option always wins? If the buyer was weighing you on price, or speed, or a checklist of features, you did not lose that deal in the room. You lost it earlier, the moment you let that be the measure. Now name the one thing you do that the cheap option genuinely cannot. Say it in a plain sentence. Then build every conversation you have from now on around making the buyer care about that one thing before they ever ask the price. If you cannot name it, that is not a sales problem to grind harder at. It is a positioning problem, and it is exactly what the Brand Clarity Workshop exists to fix. Four hours, the founder, a written report. £1,500 fixed. Book it at kevaltanna.com/workshop.

— kev August 2026 · London
Next essay

The brief is always wrong.

If this sounds familiar

The essay diagnoses. The workshop is where we actually fix it.

Four hours, the founder, a written report. £1,500, fixed. If we're not the right fit afterwards, you keep the clarity anyway.

Book an intro call